Unmasking Identity Risks Before They Become Breaches
An effective identity security strategy must move beyond siloed tools and reactive policies. It requires unified visibility across all users and assets, contextual understanding of privilege, and automated enforcement of least-privilege principles.
Posted: Friday, Aug 15

i 3 Table of Contents

Unmasking Identity Risks Before They Become Breaches

Modern enterprise IT environments have grown increasingly complex, comprising sprawling networks of users, devices, servers, and cloud services.

With this growth comes a pressing vulnerability in the rise of hidden identity risks that threaten to undermine even the most robust cybersecurity postures.

An Obscured Attack Surface

As organisations expand their digital infrastructure, they inadvertently create a broader and more opaque identity attack surface. This encompasses everything from traditional employee logins and third-party access to a burgeoning ecosystem of non-human identities, such as automated scripts, APIs, service accounts, and devices, that now play integral roles in daily operations.

These non-human identities are increasingly privileged and interconnected. The more identities there are, the harder it becomes to monitor and protect them all, particularly when they exist across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments.

Blind spots in this intricate landscape are not just common but are to be expected. Without full visibility, security teams often struggle to ensure that only authorised individuals and systems are accessing sensitive resources. Every overlooked identity becomes a potential entry point for threat actors.

The Pitfalls of a Siloed Security Strategy

Compounding the issue is a continued reliance on siloed identity security solutions. Many organisations, rather than adopting a unified approach, deploy a patchwork of point tools to manage different segments of their infrastructure.

While each tool may offer strong protections in isolation, they rarely work cohesively. This fragmented approach introduces risk through inconsistent policy enforcement, poor integration, and a lack of central oversight.

The operational impact is just as concerning. Point solutions typically generate their own streams of alerts and notifications, creating a situation where security teams must contend with an overwhelming volume of data.

This can all too easily result in a classic case of alert fatigue. Critical threats are easily missed when they’re buried beneath a mountain of low-priority notifications.

Training is another burden. Teams need specialised knowledge to manage and maintain each solution, which increases operational complexity and inflates staffing and upskilling requirements.

The Attacker’s Perspective

From a cybercriminal’s point of view, identities are the keys to the kingdom. Rather than attempting brute-force attacks or advanced malware infections, many threat actors now opt for the stealthier route: identity compromise. Hijacking a single privileged account can provide unrestricted access to vast sections of an organisation’s IT environment.

Threat actors employ a variety of tactics to achieve this, including exploiting misconfigured identity infrastructure, targeting insecure remote access channels, or harvesting leaked credentials and API keys. Even well-meaning employees or poorly configured automation can inadvertently create conditions ripe for exploitation.

Also, the allocation of excessive privileges, especially when they’re not regularly reviewed, offers threat actors a clear path to move laterally across systems undetected. This lateral movement allows threat actors to pivot across the network, seeking out higher-value targets while evading detection.

The Case for Identity Security Risk Assessments

In response to these evolving threats, a growing number of organisations are undertaking identity security risk assessments. These are quick yet comprehensive audits designed to reveal hidden vulnerabilities across an organisation’s entire identity infrastructure.

These assessments delve into both human and non-human identities, evaluating access controls, privilege levels, credential hygiene, and policy enforcement. They also assess the effectiveness of existing tools and strategies, providing a clear picture of where defences are strong and where they fall short.

More importantly, a risk assessment isn’t just about identifying flaws.  It’s about building a roadmap for remediation. The process typically yields a prioritised action plan that addresses high-risk gaps and lays the groundwork for long-term improvements in identity governance.

A Strategic Imperative

Identity is the new perimeter in cybersecurity. As organisations continue to migrate workloads to the cloud and integrate more third-party services, securing every digital identity (both human and machine) has become a business-critical priority.

An effective identity security strategy must move beyond siloed tools and reactive policies. It requires unified visibility across all users and assets, contextual understanding of privilege, and automated enforcement of least-privilege principles.

Investing in proactive identity risk assessments is a strong first step. These evaluations help organisations not only uncover and address current vulnerabilities but also future-proof their environments against a fast-changing threat landscape.

In today’s hyperconnected world, identity is more than just a username and password,  It’s a gateway. And if organisations don’t secure that gateway, they risk paying a significant price in terms of disruption, financial losses, and corporate reputation.

Morey Haber
Morey Haber is the Chief Security Adviser at BeyondTrust and has more than 25 years of IT industry experience. During this time, he has authored four books: Privileged Attack Vectors, Asset Attack Vectors, Identity Attack Vectors, and Cloud Attack Vectors. He is a founding member of the industry group Transparency in Cyber, and in 2020 was elected to the Identity Defined Security Alliance (IDSA) Executive Advisory Board. Morey currently oversees BeyondTrust security and governance for corporate and cloud-based solutions and originally joined BeyondTrust in 2012 as a part of the eEye Digital Security acquisition where he served as a Product Owner and Solutions Engineer since 2004. Prior to eEye, he was Beta Development Manager for Computer Associates, Inc. He began his career as Reliability and Maintainability Engineer for a government contractor building flight and training simulators.
Share This